Home › TVB Resources › Industry Hot Buttons › Carriage Fees and Distant Signals
Carriage Fees and Distant Signals

Carriage Fees and Distant Signals

In November 2007, the CRTC announced it would consider rule changes regarding carriage fees and distant signals, and welcomed comments from interested parties for the hearings this April (Marketing Daily, 01/25/2008). 

CTVglobemedia and CanWest jointly submitted a formal proposal saying:

  • all cable and satellite providers should pay local broadcasters for the distribution of over-the-air signals
     
  • compensation should be linked to the provision of local programming
     
  • if cable companies want to provide out-of-market local TV stations to subscribers (allowing them to time-shift), they would need to get permission from the original broadcaster
     
  • in markets where direct-to-home penetration is 30%, carriers should have to provide local subscribers with their local TV stations (Tech Media Reports, 01/25/2008).

The Directors Guild of Canada (DGC) also supports imposing fee-for-carriage for conventional broadcasters if the funds are used to create original Canadian drama (Mediacaster, 02/25/2008).

 

Conventional broadcasters pushed for carriage fees during CRTC's 2006 review of over-the-air regulations, but their request was denied when the commission ruled in the spring of 2007 (Tech Media Reports, 01/25/2008).

 

Bell Canada, Rogers, and Telus, meanwhile, filed a submission with the CRTC against a new fee-for-carriage system (CARTT, 01/29/2008).
 

 

 

Originally Posted: 4/2/2008 9:11:17 AM
Last Updated: 3/9/2009 11:08:20 AM